People have been posting comments on the YouTube page where this resides:
3 days ago
"This is a" Six minute advertisement for a book. The "photographic evidence" is a blurred, shadowy picture of something under a tarp.
My reply:
AMELIA EARHART'S PLANE FOUND ON SAIPAN IN 1944 BY US MARINES. PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THE PLANE
Wow. Jaded much are we? The book has four decades of research, interviews, transcripts from the Marines who found the plane. I can't post all of that in a single clip. So the clip points to the book. The photo itself is not proof, the photo is from the US Marines footage (easy to find on YouTube) from June 18, 1944, the day before the plane was found by US Marines. (and reported in the book as such). the idea that the photo is going to prove something is silly - what the footage proves is that there were only two hangars standing on Aslito when the footage was taken. And only one had planes in it. So when the Marines were ordered to guard it the following day - there was only ONE HANGAR THAT HAD PLANES IN IT. And as the book notes a dozen Marines, GI's, vets saw it in the only hangar on the field. It's inference. If one actually reads the book SHE WAS NEVER LOST they'll see that I was as shocked as anyone to realize there was already footage of the plane in that hangar that they guarded.
If Amelia was never lost… why didn’t she return to the United States?
My reply:
AMELIA EARHART'S PLANE FOUND ON SAIPAN IN 1944 BY US MARINES. PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THE PLANE
Because no one knew where to look for her. (or the ones who knew where she was couldn't reveal that as it would prove they'd broken the Japanese naval code). She was alive up until 1944. She knew where she was. The people who did her laundry, who guarded her, who escorted her around the island, who put her in a cell next to people who later reported seeing her - she knew where she was. It's these ridiculous people who dismiss what islanders say, who dismiss what the Marines have said, who dismiss the eyewitness reports - they're just like the military brass who decided to bury the story because it was inconvenient in the middle of a war. Today I was on a podcast and the podcaster asked "so why didn they not report finding her plane?" I replied, "Ask yourself why Churchill didn't save innocent Brits when he knew that the V2 bombs were on their way to kill them." He did so because in the middle of the war - even though the Enigma machine's code had been broken - if he saved those innocent lives, it would have revealed they'd broken their codes. And the US had broken their Navy codes in the early 1930's but no one was talking about it. The answer is; she was expendable when they knew she was on Saipan. She knew where she was, and knew she wasn't coming back. And if you read the book, she says so IN HER OWN WORDS. She landed the Electra on a coral reef, was arrested, and put in prison for the next 7 years of her life. None of that was a mystery to her.
And right here on the same page as the video, 7 more videos saying things like "The Search is over" about her plane being found elsewhere, a couple showing pictures of "the plane" in 2 different places, both under water and "just been discovered". They are all certain and positive they have solved the riddle. Yours is just one of many, and probably all are wrong. Your pix of her plane in the corner reminds me of the picture of the shooter on the grassy knoll in Dallas.....all imagination, seeing things in something that is just a blur and nothing more.
my reply:
AMELIA EARHART'S PLANE FOUND ON SAIPAN IN 1944 BY US MARINES. PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THE PLANE
I understand the dismay, disbelief and general arguments. All I can say is that I worked on both feature films about her (Keaton and Swank) have been to Saipan, have filmed 15 new eyewitnesses, have gathered over 200 island witnesses, have filmed half a dozen GI's including the Marine who decoded that message that said they'd found the plane and then guarded it "in a hangar." Only one hangar had planes in it - clearly in the footage. So I appreciate "my pictures" comment - but they aren't "my pictures" - it's 16mm footage taken on June 18th, 1944. And when I went to Baldwyn Mississippi to interview Marine Nabers, he said "he remembered it as if it were yesterday "June 19, 1944." He decoded that message - and then I've interviewed another five who saw it "in a hangar" and then have gathered dozens of GI's who "heard they'd found it on the field." It takes a certain amount of spirited denial to argue with Marines who found her briefcase, passport, maps, found a photo album with photos taken during the Last Flight, found the plane in a hangar, watched it test flown and then destroyed.. this photo is from that footage, and points to the data, the research, the data, the testimonies in the book SHE WAS NEVER LOST: THE AMELIA EARHART SAGA. Read it, don't read it - I don't care to argue something that's moot. Silly actually. but thanks for weighing in so I could repeat this comment ad nauseum.
Comment:
When I read Mr Nabers's name, along with Colonel Wallace's - I just about jumped out of my chair! This was my father's regiment, the 8th. He was in communications detail, a radio man & radio repairman, in Weapons Company, 8th regiment, 2nd Marine Division. I had corresponded with Mr Nabers many years ago (sometime in the 90s) - at that time I believe he was the president of the Mississippi chapter of the 2nd Marine Div Association. My father passed in '81 - but had I known about the possibility of Earhart's plane being there, I'd have surely asked him about it, along with many other details of their time in the Marianas, and Tarawa before that - that I have since learned much more about. He once mentioned being at a hangar and finding crates of unassembled Zeros, which were confiscated of course. Also, there are numerous eyewitness accounts by elders of Saipan about "the lady pilot". We may never know exactly what happened to her and Mr. Noonan.
My reply:
AMELIA EARHART'S PLANE FOUND ON SAIPAN IN 1944 BY US MARINES. PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THE PLANE
Thanks for weighing in... yes, I nearly jumped out of my chair when he said "I remember it as if it were yesterday" over the phone. I said "hold that thought" and flew to interview him in Baldwyn Mississippi. Everything he told me is corroborated by other marines or vets (Tom Devine, Doug Bryce, etc) In the book SHE WAS NEVER LOST there are numerous excerpts of interviews with GI's saying the same things (some from Devine's book, some from my footage). It's moot. The point is - over 200 people saw her on Saipan, and their stories have been gathered.Most were islanders, but some were soldiers. So yes, I've heard a lot about Lt. Col Clarence Wallace - as Julious called him "a bird colonel who didn't suffer fools lightly." My favorite quote of his is when an Army press officer asked to take his picture he said flatly "no." The officer insisted two more times, "it's good for morale" and Wallace turned to him and said "if you take my picture I will shoot you dead." The fuller interview with EJ is in the book, and the documentary about "Earhart's Electra" that I did back in 2012 has most of that footage. Thanks for weighing in. (Fred was executed - either for throwing soup at a soldier, or for admitting being a spy. Either way multiple reports say it was a beheading - which was reserved for soldiers to give them a "quick return to Tushita heaven." So if the multiple reports are accurate about the beheading it's likely because of the idea that he saved Amelia by saying he was the spy. She was seen on the island as late as the spring of 1944.
READ THE BOOK
On the side of this page are longer interviews with EJ Nabers, Tom Devine, Robert Wallack, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment